Posts Tagged: "other barks and bites"

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 6: CAFC Issues Precedential Opinions; Software Company Must Pay Columbia University $481.3 Million for Patent Infringement; Senate IP Subcommittee Discusses SHOP SAFE Act

This week in Other Barks & Bites: The U.S. Supreme Court denies a hearing to music publishers who accused a website of infringing on the copyright of live music performances; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issues two precedential patent opinions; X Social Media sues Elon Musk’s social media platform X for copyright infringement; and the PTAB grants Mylan Pharmaceutical’s petition for an inter partes review on the validity of Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Wegovy patents.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 29: SCOTUS Grants Copyright Petition; Massachusetts Court Overturns $176.5 Million Patent Infringement Judgment Against Eli Lilly; and Hollywood Writers Reach Tentative Agreement with Studios, Including Copyright Protections from AI

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Supreme Court grants a copyright case; the Writers Guild of America reaches an agreement with Hollywood studios that offers writers some copyright protections from AI-generated scripts; the CAFC affirms a PTAB decision that invalidated a medical alarm patent; and Getty Images releases a commercially safe AI generative tool.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 22: CAFC Says Reasonable Expectation of Success Findings Can Be Implicit; Authors Guild Sues OpenAI for ‘Flagrant’ Copyright Infringement; EPO Report Finds Massive Growth in 3D Printer Patent Filings

This week in Other Barks & Bites: CAFC says reasonable expectation of success findings can be implicit when combined with other analyses; Yale University settles a ketamine patent royalty dispute with the Department of Veterans Affairs for $1.5 million; the USPTO announces Mary Fuller as the new director of the Silicon Valley Regional Office; a group of famous authors files a lawsuit against OpenAI accusing the generative AI company of copyright infringement.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 15: CAFC Issues Precedential Ruling in Design Patent Case; Tech Titans Testify Before Congress on AI; FTC Publishes Policy Statement on ‘Improper Patent Listings’

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the CAFC issues a precedential ruling in a design patent win for Columbia Sportswear; the country’s biggest tech CEOs testify before Congress on the state of artificial intelligence (AI) in the United States; the Federal Trade Commission releases a policy statement charging that brand pharmaceutical companies are improperly listing patents in the Orange Book; and the IFPMA explained the pharmaceutical industry’s priorities of innovation and pandemic preparedness.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 8: District Court Reverses Jury Ruling That Found Google Infringed on Audio Technology Patents; ITIF Pushes Back Against Academic Article Advocating for Reduction of Drug Prices; Copyright Office Denies Artist Copyright Claim of AI-Generated Art Piece

This week in Other Barks & Bites: A California district court dismisses a copyright infringement lawsuit against musicians Sam Smith and Nomani; the U.S. Copyright Office denies an award-winning artist copyright registration on an AI-generated piece of art; and a Delaware district judge reveres a jury ruling that awarded $15.1 million to a company that accused Google of patent infringement.